General Aspects/Case Studies on Sources and Bioremediation Mechanisms of Metal(loid)s 153
Figure 9.1. A description of the interactions between plants and metal contamination as well as potential outcomes for the
metal contaminants (Ojuederie and Babalola 2017).
metal(oid) removal also have some shortcomings. These include the requirements for nutritional
resources, certain climatic conditions, and appropriate soil properties for normal plant growth
(Karami and Shamsuddin 2010). The most significant disadvantages of phytoextraction are the
lengthy time required, which has hampered the widespread implementation of phytoremediation.
An overview of plant-metal contaminants interaction and the possible fate of the metal contaminants
is shown in Figure 9.1.
9.5.1 Valence Reduction/Oxidation
The mechanism involved in the reduction of Se, Hg, Cr, and As, among other metal(loid)s, was
developed as a result of the oxidation/reduction processes carried out by beneficial microorganisms.
Metal(loid) speciation and mobility are influenced by redox processes. As(III) gets converted to
As(V) by microorganisms in sediments and soils (Bachate et al. 2012, Battaglia Brunet et al. 2002).
As(V) has a strong attraction for inorganic soil elements, it gets immobilized following its oxidation.
In well-drained soils, As(V) is the dominant form of As, whereas in poorly drained soils, As(III)
predominates, however arsine gas (H2As) [As(0)] and elemental arsenic can also be found. In most
–
cases, the breakdown of organic materials by bacteria, the reduction is followed by the role of SO4
as the terminal e- acceptor, and then reduction, mediates the reduction and methylation processes
in sediments (Kim et al. 2002). In the instance of Cr, its mobility and bioavailability improve with
its oxidation into Cr(VI). Oxidizing agents like Mn(IV), Fe(III) to a small extent, while the Cr(VI)
- Cr(III) reduction is mediated by mechanisms that are both abiotic and biotic (Choppala et al.
2015). The settings having an accessible available electron source Fe(II), chromate Cr(VI) can get
reduced into Cr(III). When organic fraction serves as an e- donor, reduction via microbial Cr(VI) is
boosted, while a marked enhancement of Cr(VI) reduction can be observed under acidic conditions
(Choppala et al. 2015, Hsu et al. 2009). The metal(loid)s are usually reduced rather than oxidized
in most biological systems. Chemical reductants like sulfide or hydroxylamine, or glutathione
reductase biochemically reduce Se (Zhang et al. 2004). Microorganisms have a major bearing in
converting the reactive Hg(II) species into its non-reactive counterpart Hg(0), which is susceptible
to losses by volatilization. Mercuric reductases have been known to reduce Hg(II) into Hg(0), and
the bacteria Shewanella oneidensis, which carries out dissimilatory metal(loid) reduction, has been
demonstrated to reduce Hg(II) into Hg(0) when electron donors are present (Wiatrowski et al. 2006).